RESEARCH STATUSEvery figure on this site is at research status. No reviewer has signed one off, and the national schedule was transcribed by eye from page scans.

Motorcycle helmets

Three rungs of this ladder come from the order. The fourth does not, and cannot: a certification stamp is printed directly over the figure in the only copy anyone can obtain. The number on this page for that rung comes from the statute the order's own heading names, and the page says so where the row is.

[ PHOTO ]int-helmet4:3

The rider ladder

Four rungs, and the fourth comes from somewhere else

It applies to the driver and to the back rider alike — each can be liable for failing to wear a helmet and for failing to require the other to.

← swipe to see the whole table →

Helmet penalties
Offence	Fine	Also	Source
First offence	₱1,500	—	SCAN · READ BY EYE
Second offence	₱3,000	—	SCAN · READ BY EYE
Third offence	₱5,000	—	SCAN · READ BY EYE
Fourth and succeeding offences	₱10,000	Driver's licence confiscatedCited to RA 10054 §7(a) — not the JAO, whose copy is illegible here	STATUTE

SourceSCAN · READ BY EYEJoint Administrative Order No. 2014-01 (DOTC + LTO + LTFRB, 3 June 2014), item I.h · page 5 of the scanIn force 3 June 2014. That is the date stamped on the order’s own face. The order does not state when it commenced: it says only that it takes effect fifteen days after publication in two newspapers and a filing with the national administrative register, and neither of those records is in this site’s corpus. So the real start date is later than the date above by an unknown margin. The order has never been amended.Source last read 7 August 2026 — a read date, not a sign-off.

The finding

Why one row cites a different instrument

The helmet ladder's fourth rung is illegible in the order's own copy

The line stating the helmet fine for a fourth and succeeding offence cannot be read in the only obtainable copy of the schedule: a certification stamp and a records-section stamp are printed physically over the figure. This is not a scanning or software failure — the ink is on top of the number. The figure this site shows for that rung comes instead from the statute the schedule's own heading names, whose first three rungs reproduce the schedule exactly, and the row says which instrument it came from.

Joint Administrative Order No. 2014-01 (DOTC + LTO + LTFRB, 3 June 2014), item I.h · page 5 of the scan

That rung also confiscates the driver’s licence, which the statute states in the same clause as the figure.

Check a rung

Which offence is this?

Your offence count

Offence number

None of these ladders states a reset window. No instrument in this corpus says an offence count lapses after a period, so a second offence is a second offence however long ago the first was.

What that rung states

Fine stated

Fine: ₱1,500
Also: —

JAO 2014-01 §I.h, with the fourth rung from RA 10054 §7(a)

Two rules people get wrong

A fake mark, and the tricycle exemption

Not a lesser offence

A fake standards sticker is the same as no helmet

Wearing a helmet with a counterfeit Philippine Standard or Import Commodity Clearance sticker is, by the order’s own words, the same offence as riding without a helmet at all. It is not priced lower and it is not a separate item.

A real exemption

Tricycle drivers are outside this rule

The Act exempts drivers of tricycles from the mandatory-helmet requirement. This site’s engine refuses to price a tricycle rider rather than returning a zero, because a zero would read as a fine of nothing rather than as a rule that does not apply.