PREVIEW

PREVIEW — figures are transcribed, not yet reviewed. Check the cited instrument before relying on them.

MultaGuide
RESEARCH STATUSEvery figure on this site is at research status. No reviewer has signed one off, and the national schedule was transcribed by eye from page scans.

NCAP camera locations

People arrive here looking for a map. There isn't one — not a hidden one, not one this site failed to find, but one that no authority in this market has published. This page states what does exist: the enforcement scheme, and the ladder it feeds.

What enforces speed here

A camera scheme, run by the capital's authority and by individual local governments

No officer, no stop, no roadside moment — a camera records the plate and a notice follows. The full mechanics and the scheme's unresolved legal status are on the no-contact apprehension page; this is the part that matters for finding a camera.

The capital’s authority operates under a harmonisation template, and 17 local governments inside the capital region legislate for themselves besides. Four were confirmed by name as having adopted something — Quezon City (SP-3172 S-2023), Muntinlupa (2023-055), Taguig, Mandaluyong (917 S-2023)— and for none of them was the underlying ordinance text itself obtainable. The scheme’s posture in the courts is no longer restrained, not affirmatively validated.

That is scope information — which authority may run cameras, in which area, under what legal footing. It is not location information, and the two should not be confused: an authority publishing that it operates a scheme is a different act from an authority publishing where its devices sit.

SourceSECONDARY · NOT PRINTEDSecondary source only — no primary text was obtainable, and no figure is printed from itIn force 1 March 1995. That is the day the Act was approved. The Act itself commences fifteen days after it is published, and the publication record is not in this site’s corpus — so the real start date is later than the date above by an unknown margin.Source last read 7 August 2026 — a read date, not a sign-off.

The full account — the litigation history, and why “no longer restrained” is not the same thing as “upheld” — is on the no-contact apprehension page.

The penalty ladder

There is no fine that scales with how a camera catches you

A camera-issued notice does not carry its own amount. What it feeds into is the same national machinery every other apprehension does — and that machinery has no dial for speed.

This site’s own speed-limits page states the finding directly: nothing in the instruments this project could obtain prices speeding by how far over the limit you were, at any level of government. Where a speed-limit violation is charged under national law it goes to the schedule’s flat catch-all — ₱1,000 — the same figure every non-speed violation in that closed list can attract, or to reckless driving where the conduct is separately classified.

What that notice does start is the same procedure every apprehension starts: a contest-or-settle window, and a licence consequence if it is missed rather than a bigger fine. That procedure is on the paying a fine page.

SourceSCAN · READ BY EYEJoint Administrative Order No. 2014-01 (DOTC + LTO + LTFRB, 3 June 2014), item I.j · page 6 of the scanIn force 3 June 2014. That is the date stamped on the order’s own face. The order does not state when it commenced: it says only that it takes effect fifteen days after publication in two newspapers and a filing with the national administrative register, and neither of those records is in this site’s corpus. So the real start date is later than the date above by an unknown margin. The order has never been amended.Source last read 7 August 2026 — a read date, not a sign-off.

No demerit-point system anywhere in this corpus

A demerit-point system is widely reported to exist under the implementing rules of a 2019 licensing law. This site read that Act in full: it carries no point or demerit mechanics of any kind, and is instead a statute about how long a licence lasts and about fraud in applying for one. The implementing rules themselves could not be obtained, and the secondary sources that describe the point system disagree with each other about its thresholds. No point value appears anywhere on this site.

The question this page gets asked

No authority in this market publishes where the cameras are

Not a hard-to-find dataset, and not one this project failed to reach — a register of camera locations, coordinates or a device count. What is public, as stated above, is scope: which body may operate cameras, and where its jurisdiction runs. Where a specific device sits is not published by the capital’s authority, by any of the local governments party to the scheme, or by the national licensing agency, in anything this project could find.

That is a finding about what exists to publish, not an unfinished search. Anything offered as exact camera coordinates for this market is not reproducing something an authority released.

If a notice has already arrived

The location does not change what to do with it

Whether or not you can name the device that caught it, the notice itself sets the same clock.

Read who issued it — the capital’s authority or the city or municipality whose ordinance applies — because that is whose procedure and whose contest window govern, not the national schedule this site otherwise models. Then follow the paying a fine steps this site does document: answer in writing, inside the stated window, and keep the date.

This site holds no plate lookups, no camera map and no way to check a specific apprehension — the reasoning for that, and where to go instead, is set out in full on the no-contact apprehension page.

Every figure names the instrument it came from and whether that instrument was a statute text or a page scan.